Derock Comments - tRPC

Derock

•Created by Derock on 1/13/2024 in #❓-help

is there a way to send a streaming response

it's not much, but pledged $20 to the polar.sh fund for #4477

6 replies

•Created by Derock on 1/13/2024 in #❓-help

is there a way to send a streaming response

hopefully this gets finished at somepoint

6 replies

•Created by Derock on 1/13/2024 in #❓-help

is there a way to send a streaming response

just found https://github.com/trpc/trpc/pull/4911

6 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/4/2023 in #❓-help

How to set cookies in trpc response?

@Zeryther / @DxD My solution was the following: inside of the route handler for TRPC, I passed the response headers:

// src/app/api/trpc/trpc/[trpc]
const handler = (req: NextRequest) =>
  fetchRequestHandler({
    endpoint: "/api/trpc",
    req,
    router: appRouter,
-   createContext: () => createTRPCContext
+   createContext: ({ resHeaders }) => createTRPCContext({ req, resHeaders }),
  });

// src/app/api/trpc/trpc/[trpc]
const handler = (req: NextRequest) =>
  fetchRequestHandler({
    endpoint: "/api/trpc",
    req,
    router: appRouter,
-   createContext: () => createTRPCContext
+   createContext: ({ resHeaders }) => createTRPCContext({ req, resHeaders }),
  });

and then updated createTRPCContext to store the resHeaders in the context, and in my tRPC routes I was able to access that and set the cookie using

ctx.resHeaders.set("Set-Cookie", `sessionToken=${token}; Expires=${expire.toUTCString()}; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict`);

ctx.resHeaders.set("Set-Cookie", `sessionToken=${token}; Expires=${expire.toUTCString()}; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict`);

Lastly, the template I used (t3-app) uses unstable_httpBatchStreamLink by default. Setting headers is not supported in this, so I had to use a splitLink so that my auth requests would use httpLink instead.

11 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/4/2023 in #❓-help

How to set cookies in trpc response?

i have a solution but i am currently in a class. i will let you know how i fixed it later today

11 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

but looks like it was never merged

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

dunno what happened to that PR

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

nevermind

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

turns out there's a lazy mode

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

found this!

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

it opens a ws on page load, even if it's not needed

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

it does

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

will splitLink keep an open WS even if it's not needed?

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

thanks

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

will look into that

15 replies

•Created by Derock on 11/11/2023 in #❓-help

Is it possible to only use WebSockets when necessary, otherwise use httpbatch or http?

ooh did not know that existed

15 replies

•Created by cadams on 11/1/2023 in #❓-help

When error in tRPC route, the error message is vauge

No description

12 replies